Examination paper of 23 was found cheating change results invalid prosecution request to revoke the trial was split again sued translation candidates to come appraisal center newspaper news (reporter Wang Wei) attend countrywide translation special field qualification examination papers changed 23,Womens Puma Tennis, were identified as cheating results invalid candidates, Mr.
Wang will Chinese translation of foreign professional qualification evaluation center appeals to to the court, requesting revocation decision.Reporter was informed today, in a court case.Mr. Wang in the first half of the year in 2010 countrywide translation special field qualification (level) of French band two test, the paper changed 23.
Chinese translation of foreign professional qualification evaluation center found cheating.He appeals to to the court, the court for revocation of the decision.Shortly afterward, appraisal center again their achievement to make null and void.
Pointed out that the paper sheet has 23 obvious change,Puma Tour Cat Lo L Canada, commissioned by the Beijing people's livelihood evidence judicial identification of the identification,Christian Louboutin Sandal Cheap, the 23 changes of letters and letter writing is not the same person.
According to provisions of examination paper for cheating examination paper,Womens Puma Fluxion II sale, examination results invalid.Mr. Wang may maintain this,Puma BMW Sauber F1 sale, he thought the evaluation center prior to the decision has been the court for revocation, two decision based on the fact basically the same.
Appraisal center cannot prove the cheat in the examination, also cannot prove he was after the exam cheating behavior with others.At the same time, Mr Wang thinks, appraisal center is in the grading process of discovering problems and to make their own decisions, rather than in logging process of discovering problems.
This is the examination of the two different stages, the assessment decision book erroneous application of the law.The trial court decision that appraisal center and without undue, Mr litigation claims lack of factual and legal basis, judgment dismissing his claim.
Mr. Wang not initiate an appeal, he thinks the Evaluation Center finds his examination cheating of insufficient evidence, appraisal center of the judicial identification of the procedure and structure are serious problems, evaluation center in logging process find the exam cheating statutory authority.
He request the court to revoke the first-instance judgment,pandora buy, decision cancel evaluation center.The case is currently pending further process.Welcome to comment I want to comment micro-blog recommended |
Wang will Chinese translation of foreign professional qualification evaluation center appeals to to the court, requesting revocation decision.Reporter was informed today, in a court case.Mr. Wang in the first half of the year in 2010 countrywide translation special field qualification (level) of French band two test, the paper changed 23.
Chinese translation of foreign professional qualification evaluation center found cheating.He appeals to to the court, the court for revocation of the decision.Shortly afterward, appraisal center again their achievement to make null and void.
Pointed out that the paper sheet has 23 obvious change,Puma Tour Cat Lo L Canada, commissioned by the Beijing people's livelihood evidence judicial identification of the identification,Christian Louboutin Sandal Cheap, the 23 changes of letters and letter writing is not the same person.
According to provisions of examination paper for cheating examination paper,Womens Puma Fluxion II sale, examination results invalid.Mr. Wang may maintain this,Puma BMW Sauber F1 sale, he thought the evaluation center prior to the decision has been the court for revocation, two decision based on the fact basically the same.
Appraisal center cannot prove the cheat in the examination, also cannot prove he was after the exam cheating behavior with others.At the same time, Mr Wang thinks, appraisal center is in the grading process of discovering problems and to make their own decisions, rather than in logging process of discovering problems.
This is the examination of the two different stages, the assessment decision book erroneous application of the law.The trial court decision that appraisal center and without undue, Mr litigation claims lack of factual and legal basis, judgment dismissing his claim.
Mr. Wang not initiate an appeal, he thinks the Evaluation Center finds his examination cheating of insufficient evidence, appraisal center of the judicial identification of the procedure and structure are serious problems, evaluation center in logging process find the exam cheating statutory authority.
He request the court to revoke the first-instance judgment,pandora buy, decision cancel evaluation center.The case is currently pending further process.Welcome to comment I want to comment micro-blog recommended |
No comments:
Post a Comment